Vanilla ice jojo11/4/2022 The company doing the localization might have very well changed the name to avoid a legal fight they couldn't afford even if they were certain to prevail in the end.Īt least for the Vanilla Ice character there's another fairly obvious reason why the name would be been changed. That said, even if they don't have a leg to stand on, it's much easier for an American to cause legal trouble for an American company in the American courts, than it is for them to do the same to an Japanese company in a Japanese court. I don't know if Vanilla Ice ever had much of presence in Japan, but Steely Dan has toured there, so the group would be entitled to just as much protection of their name in Japan as the US. Also copyright protection is automatically world wide, and trademark protection goes wherever the product does. On the other hand, Steely Dan's name is not exactly original, they took their name from a strap-on dildo in a William S. In the case of Vanilla Ice his abandoned registered trademark in the US would have only covered "Audio and video recordings featuring music and artistic performances T-shirts Entertainment in the nature of live MUSICAL performances by AN INDIVIDUAL ", and not characters in comic books and cartoons. You can't copyright a name and I don't think trademark law would apply because there's no chance a consumer would confuse these very different products. I don't think are there any real copyright or trademark issues that would prevent the names Vanilla Ice or Steely Dan being used in the English localization. But I imagine the translators wanted to avoid any risk of going to court to argue about this, so they voluntarily changed the names. The US fair use laws do list parodies as a protected class of work, so according to what little I know of Jojo's Bizarre Adventure and fair use law, it could probably be argued in court that this is a parody and therefore a protected usage. (But even if there was a "Vanilla Thaddeus Ice" living in Gary, Indiana, the kind of money that a major record label used to be able to command could probably convince him to give permission for the trademark.) (So we should really write Vanilla Ice™ and Steely Dan™.) The names have appeared on several CD covers, so that clause is covered and it seems unlikely that the actual name of any living person is "Vanilla Ice" or "Steely Dan". I couldn't find any specific source saying that Vanilla Ice and Steely Dan were trademarked, but it seems likely they are. However, an artist’s name or pseudonym affixed to an original work of art (sculptures, paintings, jewelry), need not show Not merely the artist’s name or the name of the group. Applications seeking to register a nameĪs a service mark must show a use in connection with the service, and The mark appears on at least two different works (e.g., multiple CDĬovers). Register a performer’s name as a trademark must include evidence that In addition to the consent requirement, applications seeking to Living individual must be in the application file. Looks like a person’s name), then a statement that the mark is not a Individual, but could be interpreted as a name (e.g., a band name that VANILLA ICE JOJO REGISTRATIONUse and registration of the name must be included in the applicationįile. Stage name) of any living individual, then the person’s consent to the If the name is an actual name (including a nickname or If the mark appears toīe a person’s name, then there are additional requirements for theĪpplication. Trademark, including a stage name or pseudonym. Sometimes musicians and artists want to register their name as a I found a page from the US Government's Patent and Trademark Office that explains when a musician can trademark a name.
1 Comment
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |